Why Women Still Deserve More Than Just Time Off for IVF: A Tough Truth About Fertility Support
If you thought getting time off work for IVF was the final victory in fertility support, think again.
Recently, Helen Coffey’s compelling piece in The Independent, “Of course women should be allowed time off work for IVF”, got me thinking. It's 2025, yet many of the biggest barriers to fertility treatment aren’t just about time off — they’re about access, cost, and choice.
Coffey’s article argues passionately for IVF-related workplace leave. It’s a cause worth fighting for — no doubt. IVF is physically and emotionally draining. Employers granting leave can make a world of difference. But what if that’s just scratching the surface? What if the support system needs to be way more inclusive and innovative, especially as birthrates decline and governments plead for families to grow?
Here’s the thing: IVF involves hospital visits, hormone treatments, and hefty bills. Not everyone has easy access to such clinical care. Some people don’t even want IVF due to its invasiveness or cost. So, where does that leave those who want to build families on their own terms?
This is where home insemination kits come in — and before you imagine some complicated, DIY nightmare, hear me out. Companies like MakeAMom are revolutionizing family planning by offering reusable, affordable, and discreet insemination kits designed for people who either can’t or prefer not to undergo traditional fertility treatments in clinical settings.
What’s especially cool is how MakeAMom’s kits cater to a variety of fertility needs:
- CryoBaby suits those using low-volume or frozen sperm.
- Impregnator supports users dealing with low motility sperm.
- BabyMaker is thoughtfully made for people with sensitivities like vaginismus.
Plus, these kits are reusable — a nod to sustainability and a relief to those who dread the environmental or financial cost of single-use products.
Imagine combining the right to time off work for fertility treatments with broader recognition of home-based options. The government and employers lag far behind on this, still largely stuck in the 20th century mindset of “hospital-only” fertility care.
And here’s an eye-opener: MakeAMom reports an average success rate of 67%, which is pretty impressive considering this is happening away from the clinical spotlight. Families are growing, and new parents are finding hope in these incremental yet meaningful innovations.
But there’s more — the stigma. Many couples or individuals feel isolated or embarrassed about their fertility journeys. Receiving a plain-packaged kit sent right to your door, free from judgment or fanfare, is invaluable. It’s private empowerment at its best.
The takeaway?
- Work policies need to catch up, offering leave not just for hospital IVF but also for complex home fertility processes.
- Insurance and public health should consider supporting home insemination tools as valid and effective options.
- We, as a community, need to normalize a wide spectrum of fertility journeys — from traditional IVF to personalized, at-home insemination.
So next time there’s chatter about fertility support or birthrate concerns, let’s push for solutions that embrace all paths toward parenthood. It’s not only about time off work — it’s about choice, access, affordability, and dignity.
If you’re curious about how to approach fertility care from home or want to learn more about sustainable, reusable insemination tools, take a look at MakeAMom’s innovative kits and resources. They offer a practical alternative that respects your lifestyle, budget, and privacy.
What’s your take? Should fertility rights evolve beyond workplace leave to include home-based care support? Drop your thoughts below — this conversation needs more voices.
P.S. Ever considered how eco-friendly, reusable reproductive tools could change the game for family planning? Let’s chat!
Posted on 27 July 2025 by Jordan Nguyen — 4 min